I think Mirabelli’s research question is aimed at proving
that the service industry is much more complex than the general public and
universities assume. He wants to disprove the myth that serving is only for
“ignorant and stupid (people)…(who) contribute little to society” (540). He even states, “I hope this work will
contribute to the development of understandings and policies that built more
respect and recognition for service work to help ensure it does not become
equated with servitude” (541).
Mirabelli addresses the concept of multiliteracies, or using
communication channels other than text as a literacy. The first item he looks
at is the menu, which he refers to as the “most important printed text.” He
looks at how knowing the terms on the menu can make or break a job at a
restaurant. In order to be successful, you need to know how to read customers
by using verbal and non-verbal communication. You need to be able to know what
kind of interaction they will enjoy most as well as how to appropriately respond
to their questions and comments. Since there are no long or drawn-out
monologues while serving, it is important to be friendly while being brief and
to be able to convey your message accurately and in the shortest manner
possible. This is a technique that is not taught in standard education, but
rather one that is mastered over time and with practice.
Mirabelli ultimately proves his original point that serving
is much more complex than assumed and is a field often taken for granted. In
order to understand the nature of the profession, one would have to be a part
of it, like Mirabelli. This is just one example of a profession that gains
little respect and suffers from prejudice simply because the public doesn’t
understand the complexity required or the “innovate and creative ways in which
such workers use language” (554).